THE END IS NEAR
ďIf you want to be free, learn to live simply.
Use what you have and be content where you are.Ē
Ladies and gentlemen, allow me to introduce you to a new and revolutionary literary device known as the self-interview! (Applause heard in background. Someone whoops.) Today Iíll be interviewing myself. In fact, here I am now. (Myself walks in.)
Me: Good morning, sir. Havenít I seen you somewhere before?
Myself: Cut the crap. Itís too early in the morning for this. You see me every time you look in the mirror, which isnít very often, thank god. What, for crying out loud, would possess you to interview yourself, anyway?
M: If I donít, who will?
MS: You do have a point there. In fact, that may be an issue worthy of contemplation.
M: Well, letís not get off the track. The topic of discussion today is a substance near and dear to us all. Shall we step right into it?
MS: What the hell are you talking about?
M: Iíll give you a hint. It often can be seen with corn or peanuts on its back.
M: Close, but no cigar. Actually, cigar would have been a better guess. Weíre going to talk about humanure.
MS: You dragged me out of bed and forced me to sit here in front of all these people to talk about CRAP?!
M: You wrote a book on it, didnít you?
MS: So what? OK, OK. Letís get on with it. Iíve had enough of your theatrics.
M: Well, first off, do you expect anyone to take the Humanure Handbook seriously?
MS: Why wouldnít they?
M: Because nobody gives a damn about humanure. The last thing anyone wants to think about is a turd, especially their own. Donít you think that by bringing the subject to the fore youíre risking something?
MS: You mean like mass constipation? Not quite. Iím not going to put any toilet bowl manufacturers out of business. Iíd estimate that one in a million people have any interest at all in the topic of resource recovery in relation to human excrement. Nobody thinks of human manure as a resource; the concept is just too bizarre.
M: Then whatís the point?
MS: The point is that long-standing cultural prejudices and phobias need to be challenged once in a while by somebody, anybody, or theyíll never change. Fecophobia is a deeply rooted fear in the American, and perhaps Western, psyche. But you canít run from what scares you. It just pops up somewhere else, where you least expect it. Weíve adopted the policy of defecating in our drinking water and then piping it off somewhere to let someone else deal with it. So now weíre finding that our drinking water sources are dwindling and becoming increasingly contaminated. What goes around comes around.
M: Oh, come on. I drink water every day and itís never contaminated. We Americans probably have the most abundant supply of safe drinking water of any country on the planet.
MS: Yes and no. True, your water may not suffer from fecal contamination, meaning intestinal bacteria in water. But how much chlorine do you drink instead? Then thereís water pollution from sewage in general, such as beach pollution. But I donít want to get into all this again. Iíve already discussed human waste pollution in Chapter Two.
M: Then youíll admit that American drinking water supplies are pretty safe?
MS: From disease-causing microorganisms, generally yes, they are. Even though we defecate in our water, we go to great lengths and expense to clean the pollutants back out of it. The chemical additives in our water, such as chlorine, on the other hand, are not good to drink. And letís not forget that drinking water supplies are dwindling all over the world, water tables are sinking, and water consumption is on the increase with no end in sight. That seems to be a good reason to not pollute water with our daily bowel movements. Yet, thatís only half the equation.
M: What do you mean?
MS: Well, weíre still throwing away the agricultural resources that humanure should be providing us. Weíre not maintaining an intact human nutrient cycle. By piping sewage into the sea, weíre essentially dumping grain into the sea. By burying sludge, weíre burying a source of food. Thatís a cultural practice that should be challenged. Itís a practice thatís not going to change overnight, but will change incrementally if we begin acknowledging it now.
M: So whatíre you saying? You think everybody should shit in a five-gallon bucket?
MS: God forbid. Then you would see mass constipation!
M: Well then, I donít understand. Where do we go from here?
MS: Iím not suggesting we have a mass cultural change in toilet habits. Iím suggesting that, for starters, we need to change the way we understand our habits. Most people have never heard of such a thing as a nutrient cycle. Many people donít even know about compost. Recycling humanure is just not something people think about. Iím simply suggesting that we begin considering new approaches to the age-old problem of what to do with human excrement. We also need to start thinking a bit more about how we live on this planet, because our survival as a species depends on our relationship with the Earth.
M: Thatís a beginning, but thatís probably all weíll ever see in our lifetime, donít you think? Some people, like you for example, will think about these things, maybe write about them, maybe even give them some lip service. Most people, on the other hand, would rather have a bag of cheese puffs in one hand, a beer in the other, and a TV in front of them.
MS: Donít be so sure about that. Things are changing. There are more than a few people who will turn off their TVs, pick the orange crumbs out of their teeth, and get busy making the world a better place. I predict, for example, that composting toilets and toilet systems will continue to be designed and redesigned in our lifetimes. Eventually, entire housing developments or entire communities will utilize composting toilet systems. Some municipalities will eventually install composting toilets in all new homes.
M: You think so? What would that be like?
MS: Well, each home would have a removable container made of recycled plastic that would act as both a toilet receptacle and a garbage disposal.
M: How big a container?
MS: Youíd need about five gallons of capacity per person per week. A container the size of a fifty gallon drum would be full in about two weeks for an average family. Every household would deposit all of its organic material except graywater into this receptacle, including maybe some grass clippings and yard leaves. The municipality could provide a cover material for odor prevention, consisting of ground leaves, rotted sawdust, or ground newsprint, neatly packaged for each household and possibly dispensed automatically into the toilet after each use. This would eliminate the production of all organic garbage and all sewage, as it would all be collected without water and composted at a municipal compost yard.
M: Whoíd collect it?
MS: Once every couple of weeks or so, your municipality or a business under contract with your municipality would take the compost receptacle from your house. A new compost receptacle would then replace the old. This is already being done in the entire province of Nova Scotia, Canada, and in areas of Europe where organic kitchen materials are collected and composted.
When toilet material is added to the collection system, your manure, urine, and garbage, mixed together with ground leaves and other organic refuse or crop residues, would be collected regularly, just like your garbage is collected now. Except the destination would not be a landfill, itíd be the compost yard where the organic material would be converted, through thermophilic composting, into an agricultural resource and sold to farmers, gardeners, and landscapers whoíd use it to grow things. The natural cycle would be complete, immense amounts of landfill space would be saved, a valuable resource would be recovered, pollution would be prevented, and soil fertility would be enhanced. So would our long-term survival as human beings on this planet.
M: I donít know . . . how long before people will be ready for that?
MS: In Japan today, a similar system is in use, except that rather than removing the container and replacing it with a clean one, the truck that comes to pick up the humanure suctions it out of a holding tank. Sort of like a truck sucking the contents out of a septic tank.
Such a truck system involves a capital outlay about a third of that for sewers. One study which compares the cost between manual humanure removal and waterborne sewage in Taiwan estimates manual collection costs to be less than one-fifth the cost of waterborne sewage treated by oxidation ponds. That takes into account the pasteurization of the humanure, as well as the market value of the resultant agricultural soil additive.1
M: But thatís in the Far East. We donít do stuff like that in America.
MS: One of the most progressive large scale examples I have seen is in Nova Scotia, Canada. On November 30, 1998, Nova Scotia banned all organic material from entering its landfills. The municipality provides free receptacles for every household to deposit their food scraps into. So when a banana peel or burnt pop-tart gets pitched into the trash, it goes into the green cart along with egg shells, coffee grounds, and even cereal boxes, waxed paper, and file folders. Then, every two weeks, a truck comes around, just like the standard garbage trucks weíre used to seeing, and picks up the organic material. From there, it goes to one of many central composting yards, where the material gets run through a grinder and shoved into a giant composting bin. Within 24 to 48 hours, the thermophilic microorganisms in the garbage have raised the temperature of the organic mass to 60-70įC (140-158įF). And itís a natural process.
The Netherlands was one of the first countries to mandate large scale source separation of organic material for composting, having done so since 1994; in at least five European countries, such separation is common.2 Since 1993, in Germany, for example, discarded waste material must contain less than 5% organic matter, otherwise the material has to be recycled, mainly by composting.3 In England and Wales, a target has been set to compost a million tonnes of organic household material by the year 2000.4
M: But those are not toilets.
MS: Canít you see? This is only one small step away from collecting toilet materials and composting them, too. Toilets will be redesigned as collection devices, not disposal devices. Weíve developed the art, science, and technology of composting enough to be able to constructively recycle our own excrement on a large scale.
M: So why donít we?
MS: Because humanure doesnít exist, as far as most compost professionals are concerned. Itís not even on the radar screen. Human manure is seen as human waste, something to be disposed of, not recycled. When I was visiting composting operations in Nova Scotia, one compost educator told me there were 275,000 metric tonnes of animal manures produced annually in his county suitable for composting. He did not include human manure in his assessment. As far as he was concerned, humans are not animals and they donít produce manure.
To give you an example of how clueless Americans are about composting humanure, let me tell you about some missionaries in Central America.
MS: Thatís right. A group of missionaries was visiting an indigenous group in El Salvador and they were appalled by the lack of sanitation. There were no flush toilets anywhere. The available toilet facilities were crude, smelly, pit latrines that bred flies. When the group returned to the United States, they were very concerned about the toilet problem they had seen, and decided they should help. But they didnít know what to do. So they shipped a dozen portable toilets down there, at great expense.
M: Portable toilets?
MS: Yeah, you know, those big, plastic outhouses you see at rest stops along the highways, at construction sites, and festivals. The ones that smell bad, and are filled with a blue liquid choked with floating turds and toilet paper.
M: Oh yeah.
MS: Well, the village in El Salvador got the portable toilets and the people there set them up. They even used them ó until they filled up. The following year, the missionaries visited the village again to see how their new toilets were working.
MS: And nothing. The toilets had filled up and the villagers stopped using them. They went back to their pit latrines. They had a dozen portable toilets sitting there filled to the brim with urine and crap, stinking to high heaven, and a fly heaven at that. The missionaries hadnít thought about what to do with the toilets when they were full. In the US, theyíre pumped out and the contents are taken to a sewage plant. In El Salvador, they were simply abandoned.
M: So whatís your point?
MS: The point is that we donít have a clue about constructively recycling humanure. Most people in the US have never even had to think about it, let alone do it. If the missionaries had known about composting, they may have been able to help the destitute people in Central America in a meaningful and sustainable way. But they had no idea that human manure is as recyclable as cow manure.
M: Let me get this straight. Now youíre saying that humans are the same as cows?
MS: Well, all animals defecate. Many westerners simply wonít admit it. But weíre starting to. We Americans have a long way to go. The biggest obstacle is in understanding and accepting humanure and other organic materials as resource materials rather than waste materials. We have to stop thinking of human excrement and organic refuse as waste. When we do, then weíll stop defecating in our drinking water and stop sending our garbage to landfills.
Itís critical that we separate water from humanure. As long as we keep defecating in water weíll have a problem that we canít solve. The solution is to stop fouling our water, not to find new ways to clean it up. Donít use water as a vehicle for transporting human excrement or other waste. Humanure must be collected and composted along with other solid (and liquid) organic refuse produced by human beings. We wonít be able to do this as long as we insist upon defecating into water. Granted, we can dehydrate the waterborne sewage sludge and compost that. However, this is a complicated, expensive, energy-intensive process. Furthermore, the sludge can be contaminated with all sorts of bad stuff from our sewers which can become concentrated in the compost.5
M: Composting sewage sludge is bad?
MS: No. In fact, composting is probably the best thing you can do with sludge. Itís certainly a step in the right direction. There are many sludge composting operations around the world, and when the sludge is composted, it makes a useful soil additive. Iíve visited sludge composting sites in Nova Scotia, Pennsylvania, Ohio, and Montana, and the finished compost at all of the sites is quite impressive.
M: Itíll never happen (shaking his head). Face it. Americans, westerners, will never stop shitting in water. Theyíll never, as a society, compost their manure. Itís unrealistic. Itís against our cultural upbringing. Weíre a society of Howdy-Doody, hotdogs, hairspray, and Ho-Hos, not composted humanure, fer chrissake. We donít believe in balancing human nutrient cycles! We just donít give a damn. Compost making is unglamorous and you canít get rich doing it. So why bother?!
MS: Youíre right on one point ó Americans will never stop shitting. But donít be so hasty. In 1988, in the United States alone, there were 49 operating municipal sludge composting facilities.6 By 1997, there were over 200.7 A solid waste composting plant in Oregon is designed to handle 800 tons of refuse daily.
In Duisberg, Germany, a decades-old plant composts 100 tons of domestic refuse daily. Another plant at Bad Kreuznach handles twice that amount. Many European composting plants compost a mixture of refuse and sewage sludge. There are at least three composting plants in Egypt. In Munich, a scheme was being developed in 1990 to provide 40,000 households with ďbiobinsĒ for the collection of compostable refuse.8
Itís only a matter of time before the biobin concept is advanced to collect humanure as well. In fact, some composting toilets already are designed so that the humanure can be wheeled away and composted at a separate site. Eventually, municipalities will assume the responsibility for collecting and composting all organic material from urban and suburban human populations, including toilet materials.
M: Yeah, right.
MS: And you are now revealing the main obstacle toward a sustainable society. Personal attitude. Everything we take for granted today ó shoes, clothing, metal tools, electronic equipment, heck, even toilet paper, exists for one reason, and one reason only: because someone in the past cared about the future. Youíd be running around naked today chasing rabbits with a stick if people in the past hadnít made things better for us in the present. We all have an obligation to our future generations. Thatís what evolution is, and thatís what survival of the species requires. We have to think ahead. We have to care about our descendants too, and not just about ourselves. That means we have to understand that waste is not good for us, or for future generations. When we dump endless amounts of garbage into the environment with the attitude that someone in the future can deal with it, we are not evolving, weíre devolving.
M: Whatís that supposed to mean?
MS: Itís simple enough. OK, you have trash. You donít throw the trash ďout.Ē There is no ďout.Ē It has to go somewhere. So you simply sort the trash into separate receptacles in your home, and that makes it easy to recycle the stuff. When itís recycled, itís not wasted. A chimpanzee could figure that out. Itís easy to understand and itís easy to do.
A lot of compost thatís been produced by big composting plants has been contaminated with things like batteries, metal shards, bottle caps, paints, and heavy metals. As a result, much of it hasnít been useful for agriculture. Instead, itís been used for filler or for other non-agricultural applications, which, to me, is absurd. The way to keep junk out of compost is to value compostable material enough to collect it separately from other trash. A household biobin would do the trick. The biobin could be collected regularly, emptied, its contents composted, and the compost sold to farmers and gardeners as a financially self-supporting service provided by independent businesses.
The trick to successful large-scale compost production can be summed up in two words: source separation. The organic material must be separated at the source. This means that individual families will have to take some responsibility for the organic material they discard. They will no longer be permitted to throw it all in one garbage can with their plastic Ho-Ho wrappers, pop bottles, broken cell phones, and worn out toaster ovens. Organic material is too valuable to be wasted. The people in Nova Scotia have figured that out, as have many others throughout the world. Americans are a little slow.
M: But theyíre not composting toilet materials, are they?
MS: Theyíre composting sewage sludge, which is a big step in the right direction. Some entrepreneurs are in the sewage composting business in the United States, too. In 1989, the town of Fairfield, Connecticut, contracted to have its yard material and sewage sludge composted. The town is said to have saved at least $100,000 in waste disposal costs in its first year of composting alone. The Fairfield operation is just a quarter mile from half million dollar homes and is reported to smell no worse than wet leaves from only a few yards away.9
In Missoula, Montana, all of the cityís sewage sludge is composted, and the entire composting operation is funded by the tipping fees alone. All of the compost produced is pure profit, and all of it is sold. Composting is a profitable venture when properly managed.
M: But still, thereís the fear of humanure and its capability of causing disease and harboring parasites.
MS: That's right. But according to the literature, a biological temperature of 50įC (122įF) for a period of 24 hours is sufficient to kill the human pathogens potentially in humanure. EPA regulations require that a temperature of 55įC (131įF) be maintained for three days when composting sewage sludge in bins. Thermophilic microorganisms are everywhere, waiting to do what they do best ó make compost. Theyíre on grass, tree branches, leaves, banana peels, garbage, and humanure. Creating thermophilic compost is not difficult or complicated, and thermophilic composting is what we need to do in order to sanitize human excrement without excessive technology and energy consumption. Thermophilic composting is something humans all over the world can do whether or not they have money or technology.
There will always be people who will not be convinced that composted humanure is pathogen-free unless every tiny scrap of it is first analyzed in a laboratory, with negative results. On the other hand, there will always be people, like me, who conscientiously compost humanure by maintaining a well-managed compost pile, and who feel that their compost has been rendered hygienically safe as a result. A layer of straw covering the finished compost pile, for example, will insulate the pile and help keep the outer surfaces from cooling prematurely. Itís common sense, really. The true test comes in living with the composting system for long periods of time. I don't know anyone else who has done so, but after twenty years, I've found that the simple system i use works well for me. And I don't do anything special or go to any great lengths to make compost, other than the simple things I've outlined in this book.
Perhaps Gotaas hits the nail on the head when he says, ďThe farm, the garden, or the small village compost operator usually will not be concerned with detailed tests other than those to confirm that the material is safe from a health standpoint, which will be judged from the temperature, and that it is satisfactory for the soil, which will be judged by appearance. The temperature of the compost can be checked by: a) digging into the stack and feeling the temperature of the material; b) feeling the temperature of a rod after insertion into the material; or c) using a thermometer. Digging into the stack will give an approximate idea of the temperature. The material should feel very hot to the hand and be too hot to permit holding the hand in the pile for very long. Steam should emerge from the pile when opened. A metal or wooden rod inserted two feet (0.5 m) into the pile for a period of 5-10 minutes for metal and 10-15 minutes for wood should be quite hot to the touch, in fact, too hot to hold. These temperature testing techniques are satisfactory for the smaller village and farm composting operations.Ē 10
In other words, humanure composting can remain a simple process, achievable by anyone. It does not need to be a complicated, high-tech, expensive process controlled and regulated by nervous people in white coats bending over a compost pile, shaking their heads and wringing their hands while making nerdy clucking sounds.
I want to make it clear though, that I can't be responsible for what other people do with their compost. If some people who read this book go about composting humanure in an irresponsible manner, they could run into problems. My guess is the worst thing that could happen is they would end up with a mouldered compost pile instead of a thermophilic one (I see this happen a lot). The remedy for that would be to let the mouldered pile age for a couple years before using it agriculturally, or to use it horticulturally instead.
I can't fault someone for being fecophobic, and I believe that fecophobia lies at the root of most of the concerns about composting humanure. What fecophobes may not understand is that those of us who aren't fecophobes understand the human nutrient cycle and the importance of recycling organic materials. We recycle organic refuse because we know it's the right thing to do, and we aren't hampered by irrational fears. We also make compost because we need it for fortifying our food-producing soil, and we consequently exercise a high degree of responsibility when making the compost. It's for our own good.
Then, of course, there's the composter's challenge to fecophobes: show us a better way to deal with human excrement.
M: Sounds to me like you have the final word on the topic of humanure.
MS: Hardly. The Humanure Handbook is only a tiny beginning in the dialogue about human nutrient recycling.
M: Well, sir, this is starting to get boring and our time is running out, so weíll have to wrap up this interview. Besides, I've heard enough talk about the world's most notorious "end" product. So let's focus a little on the end itself, which has now arrived.
MS: And this is it. This is the end?
M: ďThis is the end.Ē (Sung like Jim Morrison.) What díya
say folks? (Wild applause, stamping of feet, frenzied whistling, audience
jumping up and down, yanking at their hair, rolls of toilet paper thrown
confetti-like through the air, clothes being torn off, cheering and screaming.
Someone starts chanting ďSource separation, Source separation!Ē Whatís
this!? The audience is charging the stage! The interviewee is being carried out
over the heads of the crowd! Hot dang and hallelujah!)
Source: The Humanure Handbook. Jenkins
Publishing, PO Box 607, Grove City, PA 16127. To order, phone: